Posts Tagged ‘shelter forum’
CONSTRUCTION OF A TOILET GHETTO KIAMAIKO TOILET
Purpose of the project:-Improve health standard
| Project information |
Location |
Huruma |
|
Implementing agency |
CDF | |
|
Project initiation |
CDF | |
|
Estimated cost Project cost Remarks |
1,500,000 Amount allocated:2006/2007-kshs. 800,000 | |
|
Amount spent: |
800,000 | |
|
Year of funding |
2006/2007 | |
|
Status of the project |
Complete and in use | |
| Accountability standards |
Quality |
BAD |
|
Accountability |
Vital document not accessible | |
|
Status of public participation |
Low citizen participation since the community was not involved in the implementation of the project | |
|
Usage/utility |
In use but poor quality |
NB: the information in this report was drawn from the Starehe CDF website
Observations
- Cheap labor and misuse of materials
- Poor work
- Misuse of materials
- This is an irrelevant project since there were two toilets which were built by the former MP Maina Kamanda and they were not completed.
Recommendations
- The community/ beneficiaries should be fully involved in the implementation of the project
- A project committee should be formed to supervise and monitor the implementation process
- In case of misuse of fund the area MP should be arrested and prosecuted and the contractor black listed
Pictures
TOILET CONSTRUCTION NDURURUNO PRIMARY SCHOOL
Purpose of the project:-Improve health standards
| Project information |
Location |
Huruma |
|
Implementing agency |
CDF | |
|
Project initiation |
CDF | |
|
Estimated cost Project cost Remarks |
500,000 Amount allocated:2003/2004-kshs. 500,000 | |
|
Amount spent: |
498,000 | |
|
Year of funding |
2003/2004 | |
|
Status of the project |
Complete and in use | |
| Accountability standards |
Quality |
Poor |
|
Accountability |
Vital document accessible | |
|
Status of public participation |
Low citizen participation since the community was not involved in the implementation of the project | |
|
Usage/utility |
Improve health standards |
NB: The information in this report was drawn from the Starehe CDF website
observations
- shoddy job
- cheap labor
- unqualified contractor
recommendations
- A project sustainability committee should be established to ensure proper maintenance of the project
Pictures
CONSTRUCTION OF A SOCIAL HALL AND A NURSERY SCHOOL HURUMA SOCIAL HALL
Purpose of the project:-Improve social activities
| Project information |
Location |
Huruma |
|
Implementing agency |
CDF | |
|
Project initiation |
CDF | |
|
Estimated cost Project cost Remarks |
10,000,000 Amount allocated:2005/2006-kshs. 3,000,0002006/2007-kshs. 2,500,0002007/2008-kshs. 4,000,000
|
|
|
Amount spent: |
6,094,780 | |
|
Year of funding |
2005/20062006/20072007/2008 | |
|
Status of the project |
Complete and in use | |
| Accountability standards |
Quality |
Good |
|
Accountability |
Vital document accessible | |
|
Status of public participation |
Low citizen participation since the community was not involved in the implementation of the project | |
|
Usage/utility |
In use |
NB: The information in this report was drawn from the Starehe CDF website
observation
- Good finish work
Pictures
CONSTRUCTION OF POLICE POST HURUMA POLICE POST
Purpose of the project:-Improve security
| Project information |
Location |
Huruma |
|
Implementing agency |
CDF | |
|
Project initiation |
CDF | |
|
Estimated cost Project cost |
1,500,000 Amount allocated:2004/2005-kshs.1,500,0002005/2006-kshs.500,000 | |
|
Amount spent: |
2,000,000 | |
|
Year of funding |
2004/20052005/2006 | |
|
Status of the project |
Complete and in use | |
| Accountability standards |
Quality |
Good |
|
Accountability |
Vital document accessible | |
|
Status of public participation |
Both public and CDF officials were involved in this process | |
|
Usage/utility |
in use |
NB: the information in this report was drawn from the Starehe CDF website
obsevation
- shoddy job
- poor workmanship
Pictures
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF FOOT BRIDGE CONNECTING THAYU AND MASHIMONI
|
Project information |
Location |
Mathare |
|
Implementing agency |
LASDAP |
|
|
Project initiation |
Area councilor(swadi) |
|
|
Cost of the project |
Amount allocated: not availed |
|
|
Amount spent: records availed |
||
|
Year of funding |
2009-2010 |
|
|
Status of the project |
Complete but poor |
|
|
Quality |
Poor |
|
|
Accountability standards |
Accountability |
Low level of accountability and transparency since no records were available and no interaction with the beneficiaries |
|
Status of public participation |
There is Low citizen participation with allegations that the councilor does what he deems fit for the community without consulting |
|
|
Usage/utility |
In use |
Source: Beneficiaries
Observations
The project is complete but the community is afraid since the foot bridge collapse during the construction Recommendations
- City engineer should inspect why the bridge collapsed during constructions
- The community/ beneficiaries should be fully involved in the implementation of the project
- In case of misuse of fund the area councilor should be arrested and prosecuted and the contractor black listed and return the stolen fund
ROAD UPGRADING PROJECT MABATINI, MASHIMONI
|
Project information |
Location |
Mathare |
|
Implementing agency |
LASDAP |
|
|
Project initiation |
Area councilor(swadi) |
|
|
Cost of the project |
Amount allocated: not availed |
|
|
Amount spent: records availed |
||
|
Year of funding |
2009-2010 |
|
|
Status of the project |
Still under construction but poor standard |
|
|
Quality |
Poor |
|
|
Accountability standards |
Accountability |
Low level of accountability and transparency since no records were available and no interaction with the beneficiaries |
|
Status of public participation |
There is Low citizen participation with allegations that the councilor does what he deems fit for the community without consulting |
|
|
Usage/utility |
Not In use |
Source: Beneficiaries and lasdap website
Observations
Poor foundation, cheap labor, unqualified contractor, shoddy job
Recommendations
- LASDAP officials should explain why the project is incomplete
- The community/ beneficiaries should be fully involved in the implementation of the project
- A project committee should be formed to supervise and monitor the implementation process
- In case of misuse of fund the area councilor should be arrested and prosecuted and the contractor black listed















